Sheinbaum Slams 50% Steel Tariff as ‘Unjust and Unsustainable’
Youth violence isn’t the only conflict straining U.S.–Mexico ties today—economic aggression has entered the picture too. President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico has condemned the U.S. government’s newly imposed 50% tariff on steel and aluminum imports as “unjust,” “unsustainable,” and “without legal basis.” This drastic move, signed into effect by U.S. President Donald Trump, doubles the existing 25% tariff and has already taken effect.
While the tariff is global, sparing only Great Britain, its impact is particularly severe on Mexico, which is the second-largest exporter of steel and aluminum to the United States. The exports were valued at nearly $35 billion in 2024. Sheinbaum pointed out that Mexico imports more steel and aluminum from the U.S. than it exports—a fact that, she argues, invalidates the logic of the tariff.
Sheinbaum criticized the tariff’s use of national security as justification, especially given recent White House praise for U.S.–Mexico cooperation. She also noted the real economic threat: cross-border production will be disrupted, impacting industries and employment, much like the social pressures that drive youth violence.
Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard echoed the sentiment, labeling the tariff “unjust and inconvenient.” He stressed that Mexico would formally seek an exemption and warned that retaliatory measures could follow if talks fail. However, Sheinbaum emphasized Mexico’s focus on protecting jobs and industry, not escalating tensions.
The situation echoes a broader theme seen in youth violence policy: reactive punishment versus preventative cooperation. Just as youth interventions must address root causes, Sheinbaum’s administration insists on collaborative solutions over economic isolation.
